What indicator suggests that Arnie Forrest may have engaged in fraudulent behavior?

The identification of potential fraudulent behavior often involves analyzing an individual's circumstances and motivations. In the case of Arnie Forrest, facing potential termination serves as a significant indicator of possible fraud. This situation can create a strong incentive for an individual to engage in deceptive practices, such as filing a false insurance claim, to avoid negative consequences associated with losing their job. The pressure of imminent job loss may lead someone to seek financial relief through unethical means.

In contrast, being off work for several months or having a history of poor attendance could suggest personal issues affecting attendance or performance, but they do not inherently imply an intention to commit fraud. Furthermore, the fact that his employer did not miss him may imply a lack of impact on the workplace rather than directly linking to fraudulent behavior. Each of these alternatives presents situations that could occur for various reasons unrelated to fraud. Therefore, the context of facing termination highlights a motivated behavior change that aligns closely with risk factors associated with insurance fraud.