What is the fraud indicator in Waylon's case after his house burned down?

In Waylon's case, the fraud indicator is identified through the fact that the insured left town before the fire occurred. This behavior can raise suspicion because it suggests that Waylon may not have been present when the incident took place, which can imply premeditation. Leaving town prior to a significant event such as a house fire can make it more difficult to ascertain his involvement or the legitimacy of his claim. Insurance investigators often look into the actions of the insured leading up to catastrophic events. A pattern of suspicious activity, such as absences before an incident, can be a strong indicator of potential fraud, as it may suggest a level of planning or foreknowledge of the event.

The other options may have elements of concern but do not carry the same weight as an immediate indicator of possible fraudulent behavior. For instance, having filed a claim previously does not inherently mean that a subsequent claim is fraudulent. Inconsistent neighbor reports might raise questions regarding the validity of the account of the event or its circumstances, but it does not directly implicate Waylon himself. Lastly, receiving a large inheritance could be a legitimate financial event unrelated to the fire or to insurance fraud. Thus, Waylon's departure from town before the fire serves as a clearer and more direct indicator of